Acomodate an effective number of turns in number_of_turn_with_sign ids structure

The effective number of turn in T coil is now a floating number which is probably not supported by ids definition. Need to find a way to acomodate for that.

created branch 15-find-a-way-to-accomodata-an-effective-number-of-turns-in-the-number-of-turn-with-sign-in-gdat to address this issue

https://gitlab.epfl.ch/spc/tcv/tbx/gdat/blob/15-find-a-way-to-accomodata-an-effective-number-of-turns-in-the-number-of-turn-with-sign-in-gdat/matlab/TCV_IMAS/tcv_ids_coil.m#L55-60

At this stage it is supported so I would not worry I had to change the sign and the connections because most other codes do not use the connection matrix

Olivier, I will use this issue also as a scratch for myself to remember what TODO so no need to comment every statement, I will refer to you explicitly if needed, but don't feel committed to answer anytime.

Probably need to allow the G.Tbc to have non integer value.

https://gitlab.epfl.ch/spc/tcv/tbx/meq/blob/07ae9698f48bdf9cdf8ef2e2a1e90b94ebf28bac/IDS/liugtcv_IDS.m#L121

@carpanes you should not use gitlab issue messages as a scratchbook. People get e-mails everytime you write. If you want to add todo tasks for the ussue you can do it by editing the task description (there is a button for checkboxes which become tasks)

• Like this

If it is for private note taking then please use your own spaces

I agree, but:

• It is very convenient because I can point to the code directly
• I always cite you directly if I have to ask you something
• You might point me where I'm wrong

It would be helpful if there was the possibility of making this issues private. Anyway I will avoid doing it in future if it bother people.

changed title from Find a way to accomodata an effective number of turns in the number of turn with sign in gdat to Acomodate an effective number of turns in number_of_turn_with_sign ids structure

changed the description

@osauter Is the sign of the poloidal angle our static tree different than the difinition in IMAS? Or is this due to the cocos 17 to 11 transformation? https://gitlab.epfl.ch/spc/tcv/tbx/gdat/commit/726cf9d45f584b89e37cedd5fc92c3f5bda104de#note_49424